China taking advantage of America through trade and other means was a
big theme in the 2016 race. Then, Republican Donald Trump and Democratic
Senator Bernie Sanders, who is again running for president, railed against the
country for stealing American jobs and racking up a nearly $350 billion trade
deficit with the United States that year.
In the 2020 race, what has not been said has been more telling. Despite
Trump’s plan to meet Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping to possibly restart talks
on tariffs over coming days, trade was not a topic in the first debate for 10
candidates on Wednesday, though several named China as the biggest geopolitical
threat to America. In Thursday’s debate with the second batch of 10 candidates,
only one question focused on China, with businessman Andrew Yang and a few
others criticizing U.S. levies on Chinese imports.
That’s because the hardline the president has taken with Beijing is one
area of common ground. Senator Elizabeth Warren has supported tariffs on
Chinese imports. Sanders has said he would renegotiate trade deals and label
the People’s Republic a currency manipulator, something the president has also
vowed but has not yet done.
Democrats have even pressed Trump to be tougher. They worry, along with
Republicans, that the president could ease up on telecommunications firm Huawei
as part of a trade deal. Fearing back doors that would allow Beijing to spy on
U.S. communications, the government has banned firms from selling American-made
products to the group.
Still, neither Warren, Sanders nor other candidates have made dealing
with China, one of the biggest issues facing the current administration, a
significant part of their platform. Frontrunner Joe Biden, the former vice
president, went as far as to downplay China as a competitive threat, before
backtracking after Trump criticized him.
Democrats may be reluctant to back Trump, but America’s tough stance is
unlikely to ease no matter who is in the White House. Hence, Beijing shouldn't mistake the silence for softness.
No comments:
Post a Comment